ArticleCureus2026
Inserting With Care: Classification of Complications Related to Chest Drain Insertion.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Intercostal catheters (ICCs) are standard management for traumatic pneumothorax (PTx), haemothorax (HTx), and haemo/pneumothorax (H/PTx). Pigtail catheters inserted using the Seldinger technique have emerged as a recognised alternative. Insertion steps are well described through the 'triangle of safety' using the sterile technique. Complication rates for chest drains have been reported as a variable rate, but complication reporting varies considerably, and some studies may overstate the clinical significance of minor events that do not require intervention. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification provides a standardised, intervention‑based method for grading complications and may offer a more clinically meaningful assessment than descriptive categories alone. This study examines chest drain complications at a regional trauma centre, comparing both conventional categories (positional, insertional, and infective) and a CD‑based definition. Methods A retrospective audit of all adult trauma-related ICC and pigtail drain insertions at Townsville University Hospital between February 2020 and February 2025 using data acquired from the Townsville Trauma Service Trauma Registry Information System (TRIS) was undertaken. Complications were recorded using (i) conventional definitions (insertional, positional, and infective) and (ii) CD-based complications (CDI, CDII, CDIIIa, CDIIIb, CDIVa, CDIVb, CDV). Comparative analysis was also performed to identify factors associated with adverse events. Results A total of 117 chest drains were inserted into 101 patients during the study period, with 71 of those being ICCs and 46 pigtail drains. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 20.6; 90.5% percent of chest injuries were blunt and 9.5% were penetrating. Drain insertion was mostly performed for PTx and HPTx (43.6% and 41.9%, respectively), with a further 10.2% inserted for isolated HTx. One ICC was inserted for a chylothorax (CTx). The overall complication rate using the conventional definitions was 40.2% (2 insertional, 44 positional, and 1 infective). Most positional complications were due to post-drain removal (HTx (16) and PTx (20)); however, only 30% of these required drain reinsertions. The rate of complications using the CD classification was 16.2% (1 CDl, 14 CDIIIa, 3 CDIIIb, 1 CDIVa). There were no deaths related to chest drain insertion. In haemodynamically stable patients, ICCs demonstrated a higher proportion of both conventional complications (51% vs 37%) and CD‑classified complications (21.2% vs 5.3%); however, neither difference reached statistical significance. Clinician specialty and seniority had no effect on complication rates. Conclusion This study provides an important addition to the limited Australian literature on complications following chest drain insertion. Reported complication rates following chest drain insertion for chest trauma are higher using a conventional classification than with the CD classification. The additional recorded complications in the conventional classification do not result in clinically significant morbidity or interventions. Severity‑based classification for complications using the CD framework provides a more nuanced representation of patient harm and may improve the quality of future research in this area. This study supports the continued selective utilisation of pigtail catheters as a safe and less invasive alternative to ICCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.