ArticleHealth policy OPEN2026
Exploring changes to financial protection and equity in Lithuania following 2017-2020 policies to improve access to outpatient medicines.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Access to pharmaceuticals is a key area of health systems performance. Previous analyses showed medicines to be the largest contributor to catastrophic spending in Lithuania, particularly for people with lowest incomes. This paper examines changes to household spending on health following 2017-2020 pharmaceutical policies to improve access to outpatient medicines. Methods: Household spending and catastrophic health spending were calculated using household budget survey data for 2016 and 2021. Pharmaceutical policies were obtained from the review of legislation and regulation, and publications by the relevant health authorities. Results: Catastrophic spending in Lithuania reduced from 11.5% in 2016 to 9.4% in 2021, driven by reductions in out-of-pocket spending for medicines and with significant decrease in the poorest income quintile and among people aged 75 + . The measures introduced in 2017-2020 included eliminating percentage co-payments for nearly all covered medicines, as well as exempting people aged 75 + and some other groups on low income from co-payments for medicines. Conclusions: In 2017-2020 measures were implemented reduce the burden of household spending on medicines, resulting in reduction of catastrophic spending in the most vulnerable groups. Challenges remain, as still 9% of households experience catastrophic spending. Next steps could involve broadening exemptions, addressing gaps in the positive list, and understanding accessibility barriers in other health care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.