ArticleThe chronicle of mentoring & coaching2025
Impact of Mentors on Overall Faculty Experience and Reason for Leaving.
Article in The chronicle of mentoring & coaching, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skillful mentorship may be the single most influential way to retain new faculty. Inadequately mentored faculty, especially those from under-represented backgrounds, are less likely to be retained in academic careers and demonstrate lower productivity on promotion metrics, and have lower satisfaction with their careers. This study investigates relationships among faculty satisfaction with their mentors, their overall faculty experience and reasons for leaving a school of medicine (SOM), with a focus on mentorship's role in retention and potential return. This cross-sectional, descriptive study was designed primarily for theory generation rather than theory testing, and as such, did not use an explicit theoretical framework. Faculty leaving their SOM position from July 2017 through June 2024 were surveyed to collect data on their employment experiences, which included perceived helpfulness and performance of mentors, primary and secondary reasons for leaving, critical factors for faculty development and retention and overall employment experience. Ordinal variables were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Reasons-for-leaving variables association with categorical variables were analyzed using chisquare tests and generalized linear models. Faculty analyzed (N=380) were 53% female, 13% Hispanic, 55% Assistant Professor, 27% Associate, 10% Professor, 75% clinician educators, and 11% tenured/tenure-track. Satisfaction with mentoring resources was associated with inadequate mentorship as a reason for leaving (
Indexed as
Identifiers
41798588PMC12967062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.