Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798506›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Morphometric and Histological Insights to Aid Graft Selection for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Robin Saini, Ritu Sehgal, Arthi Ganapathy, Subrata Basu Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin SainiDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Ritu SehgalDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Arthi GanapathyDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.
Subrata Basu RayDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most common and debilitating knee injuries, especially in athletes. While autografts are widely used for ACL reconstruction (ACLR), the optimal choice of tendon remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze and compare the morphometric and histological characteristics of ACL and periarticular knee tendons (patellar, quadriceps, semitendinosus, gracilis, plantaris), in order to assess their suitability as grafts for ACLR. METHODOLOGY: Thirty knee joints from 15 formalin-embalmed adult cadavers of 12 (80%) males and 3 (20%) females were dissected. Morphometric parameters (length, width, and thickness) of ACL and periarticular tendons were recorded using digital calipers. Femoral and tibial footprints of the ACL were analyzed for size and shape. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's Trichrome (MT) stains, and the integrated collagen density was quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

resultsPatellar and quadriceps tendons had the largest dimensions, while gracilis showed the highest integrated collagen density, closely resembling that of the ACL. The plantaris tendon, though long, was often absent and structurally less robust. The femoral and tibial footprints displayed variable shapes, with half-moon and droplet patterns being most common, suggesting the need for personalized tunnel placement.

conclusionThe patellar, quadriceps and gracilis tendons emerge as promising grafts due to favorable morphometry, histology and integrated collagen density. Quadriceps is a viable option for ACLR, while the gracilis with plantaris is an alternative option, depending on the availability of plantaris. This study provides baseline anatomical data to guide graft selection in ACLR and highlights the need for further biomechanical and clinical validation.

Indexed as

acl injuryanterior cruciate ligamentanterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (aclr)femoral footprintgraft selectionhistologyintegrated collagen densitymorphometrythe knee jointtibial footprint

Identifiers

PMID41798506
PMCPMC12962186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.