ArticleCureus2026
Short-Term Effects of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy on Patients Following Cytoreductive Surgery: Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard of treatment for peritoneal surface malignancy. Increasing evidence demonstrates the survival benefit of CRS combined with HIPEC, with the completion of cytoreduction being a key factor in prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of HIPEC on short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing CRS and to assess factors associated with postoperative morbidity. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a maintained database of patients with peritoneal surface malignancies who underwent CRS with and without HIPEC at a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 1, 2021, to November 1, 2024. Results A total of 95 patients were included, 52 of whom underwent CRS alone and 43 received CRS combined with HIPEC. Demographic and clinical characteristics were largely similar between groups; however, patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC had higher preoperative albumin levels (p = 0.007) and more frequent previous surgeries (p = 0.020). Operative time was significantly longer in the CRS and HIPEC group (p < 0.001), and stoma creation was more common (p = 0.014). Overall, postoperative complications were fewer in the CRS and HIPEC group. The 30-day mortality rate was 0% for both groups, and the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was the only predictor of severe complications (p = 0.047). Conclusion Complete cytoreduction remains the standard in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies to maximize survival potential. The addition of HIPEC does not appear to increase short-term postoperative outcomes, while disease burden, as reflected by the PCI, remains the primary independent determinant of postoperative risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.