Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798475›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

When Nail Removal Is Not Benign: Iatrogenic Fractures Associated With Titanium Intramedullary Nail Removal.

Sunil D Magadum, Mahesh Karthik, Ram Prasad Jasti, Kamal Asbar, Umesh Kumar Singh

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sunil D MagadumOrthopaedics, MIOT International Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Mahesh KarthikOrthopaedics, MIOT International Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Ram Prasad JastiOrthopaedics, MIOT International Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Kamal AsbarOrthopaedics, MIOT International Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Umesh Kumar SinghOrthopaedics, MIOT International Hospital, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intramedullary (IM) nailing is a standard treatment for diaphyseal fractures of long bones. Several factors influence bony ingrowth and osseointegration between the nail and bone. Removal of these nails may be required, especially in younger patients, for multiple indications. Bony ingrowth and osseointegration can cause resistance and complicate nail removal. We report a series of three patients who had bony ingrowth and osseointegration within the nail and proximal metaphyseal bone, which complicated routine nail removal. One patient sustained an intertrochanteric femur fracture during the extraction of the femoral nail, while the other two patients sustained proximal tibial fractures during the extraction of the tibial nail. All fractures that occurred during nail extraction healed over a period of three to four months without complications. In this case report, we have addressed the possible reasons for this complication and methods to prevent it. Removal of an IM nail requires adequate planning and instrumentation for safe extraction. Bony ingrowth and osseointegration can complicate routine nail removal. Surgeons should be mindful of these complications and be aware of different techniques for bone removal to ensure safe nail extraction.

Indexed as

iatrogenic fractureimplant osseointegrationrisk factor for nail extractiontips for safe nail removaltitanium nail removal

Identifiers

PMID41798475
PMCPMC12967237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.