ArticleCureus2026
A Rare Case of Fluoxetine-Induced Vortex Keratopathy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vortex keratopathy is a distinctive corneal epithelial disorder marked by whorl-shaped deposits, most often linked to prolonged exposure to cationic amphiphilic medications. While classic drug associations are well established, the involvement of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors remains sparsely documented. This report describes an unusual presentation of vortex keratopathy temporally associated with long-term fluoxetine 40 mg therapy for two years. A 25-year-old woman receiving treatment for depressive disorder presented with gradually progressive bilateral visual disturbance. Comprehensive ocular examination revealed preserved best-corrected visual acuity but demonstrated bilateral, symmetrical, and vortex-patterned epithelial corneal deposits. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography localized hyperreflective changes to the corneal epithelium, with deeper layers remaining unaffected. No systemic disease, hereditary corneal disorder, or alternative medication known to cause cornea verticillata was identified. The patient had been continuously using oral fluoxetine for two years. After coordinated discussion with psychiatric services, fluoxetine was withdrawn and replaced with an alternative antidepressant. Conservative ophthalmic management with preservative-free lubricants was initiated, alongside patient counseling regarding prognosis and reversibility. Subsequent follow-up demonstrated progressive symptomatic improvement and partial regression of epithelial deposits on slit-lamp examination, without compromise of visual acuity or emergence of additional ocular pathology. This case underscores the importance of meticulous drug history assessment in unexplained corneal epithelial disorders. Although rare, fluoxetine-associated vortex keratopathy should be recognized as a reversible adverse effect, enabling timely intervention and coordinated multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.