ArticleCureus2026
Effectiveness of a Progressive Rehabilitation Approach Without Sport Activity Restriction for Acute Lumbar Spondylolysis in High-Level Athletes: A Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of high-level athletes with acute lumbar spondylolysis (ALS) treated with a progressive rehabilitation (PR) approach without rigid bracing or activity restriction.
methodsThis retrospective consecutive case series included seven high school or collegiate athletes competing at the national level who underwent a PR approach for ALS at our institution between January 2023 and December 2024. One athlete was excluded due to loss to follow-up, leaving six athletes for analysis. The intervention consisted of a PR program without rigid bracing or activity restriction, emphasizing stepwise mobility, stability, strengthening, and pain-based progression of functional movements. Main outcomes included MRI findings, pain status, return-to-sport (RTS) rate and period, and follow-up duration.
resultsTraumatic episodes were the most common etiological factor (66.7%), involving high ground reaction force movements or excessive lateral bending. MRI improvement was observed in five patients (83.3%), and pain resolution occurred in all six patients (100%). The RTS rate was 100%, with a median RTS period of 65 days (range, 54-112), which was shorter than previously reported for conservative treatment. No recurrence occurred during follow-up (median, 109 days).
conclusionsA PR approach without rigid bracing or activity restriction enabled early RTS in high-level athletes with ALS, with symptom improvement and no recurrence. This approach may allow modification of pain-provoking or injury-related movements and help minimize declines in physical fitness and body composition associated with activity restriction. It may be suitable for post-growth high-level athletes who understand the risks related to bone healing and require timely RTS, although further research is needed to clarify stage-specific indications and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.