ArticleMedical science educator2025
Navigating Without a Map: Unpacking Pedagogical Viewpoints of Health Sciences Educators Without Educational Training.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI Integration in Brazilian Master's Curricula and Its Implications in Dental Education.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An essential attribute of competent health sciences educators (HSEs) is the integration of disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge. However, many HSEs receive little or no formal educational training, raising concerns about their teaching approaches. This study addresses this issue by examining the perceptions of HSEs without formal pedagogical training regarding two central aspects: teaching and learning methods and the roles they assign to themselves and their students. Methods: The research employs a qualitative phenomenological case study involving nine HSEs from diverse fields-medical education, nursing, and podiatry-who collaborated in the observation and discussion of their own teaching practices. Discussions held around these observations were inductively analyzed to identify interpretive dimensions related to the participants' conceptualizations of their own roles, their students' roles, and their use of teaching and learning methods. Results: The findings indicate that, although participants valued methods beyond traditional lectures and acknowledged the importance of aligning teaching with assessment, they simultaneously upheld a lecture format where students primarily act as passive listeners and attributed to external factors-senior faculty or students-the difficulties in implementing more participatory strategies. Regarding their own role, participants emphasized sharing professional experience and serving as role models over content delivery. They perceived their responsibility for student motivation and success in the course as limited, approaching success through grades rather than learning. In terms of the student role, participants expected learners to assume responsibility for their own learning, demonstrated through independent study and in-class participation, distinguishing this from a focus on passing a course and grades. Discussion: The study reveals that while HSEs without educational training may express views aligned with educational literature, their interpretations often lack depth, remain teacher-centered, overlook pedagogical nuances, externalize difficulties, and exhibit unacknowledged inconsistencies. These findings highlight the importance of formal educational development programs to foster reflective practice and pedagogical growth among HSEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.