ArticleMedical science educator2025
A Safe and Effective Internal Medicine Procedure Rotation for Medical Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Problem: Although procedural rotations in internal medicine residency programs have been shown to increase trainee satisfaction and procedural experience, limited data exist on the implementation and outcomes of similar curricula for medical students. Approach: Grounded in experiential learning theory, we developed and implemented a multi-week elective procedure rotation for medical students. The curriculum included an online component and hands-on procedural training supervised by experienced faculty. Students completed pre- and post-rotation assessments, including a cognitive assessment and a Likert-style survey measuring procedural volume, confidence, and satisfaction. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon matched-pairs ranked-sum tests were used to analyze changes in continuous and ordinal outcomes, respectively. Outcomes: Before the rotation, students reported limited procedural exposure. During the elective, each student performed an average of 18 procedures-most commonly paracentesis-with no major complications. Cognitive assessment scores significantly improved from a pre-rotation average of 66.3% to 87.2% post-rotation (p < 0.001). Statistically significant increases were observed in both procedural confidence and satisfaction with procedural training. Next Steps: This elective procedure rotation was successfully integrated into the curriculum at a large academic medical center and resulted in substantial gains in student procedural exposure, knowledge, and confidence. These findings underscore the value of experiential learning for medical students and suggest that similar elective rotations at other institutions could enhance procedural training in undergraduate medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.