ArticleMedical science educator2025
An Assessment of Anki Flashcards Use in Comparison to Alternative Study Methodologies in First Year Graduate Entry Medical Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anki Use and Academic Performance in Medical Education: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Learning Theory.Medical science educator · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First year graduate entry to medicine (GEM) students require effective personalised study techniques in order to learn significant amounts of factual information. This study analysed learning methodologies utilised by a cohort of first year GEM students and their perception of their utility, particularly of the spaced-repetition learning app, Anki. Furthermore, our study compared assessment performance with study methodology utilised by this cohort of students. In total, 53 students participated in some aspect of the study, with 43 students completing all three components: a pre-module test to assess baseline knowledge of module content, a post-module test, and a survey questionnaire. Our survey revealed that students utilised a diverse range of learning and study methodologies. In terms of satisfaction rating, students positively perceived preparedness for exams and time management, irrespective of the study methodology used. While 80% of study participants reported using Anki, the number of Anki cards used and its daily usage varied significantly among users. Overall, there was no statistically significant benefit for Anki usage in terms of performance outcome compared to those who did not use Anki when the module was considered as a whole. However, we did find it to be of significant benefit to exam performance in two categories: (1) those who used Anki extensively compared to those who did not engage consistently, and (2) a significant correlation between Anki usage and physiology exam performance was identified. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02504-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.