Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798367›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Medical Students' Attitudes Towards Research Participation After the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Scoring Change.

Danxun Li, Nina Li, Curt Bay, Uzoma Ikonne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danxun Li *Eastern Virginia Medical School, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507 USA.
Nina Li *Eastern Virginia Medical School, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23507 USA.
Curt BayDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, 5850 E. Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206 USA.
Uzoma IkonneDepartment of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Old Dominion University, 700 W. Olney Rd, Norfolk, VA 23507 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5938-0699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The recent transition of scoring for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam from a numerical grading system to pass/fail system has significant implications for residency applicants. It is anticipated that research productivity will gain greater importance in the evaluation process. To understand how medical institutions can best support students, we seek to understand medical students' motivations and experience conducting research in medical school after the USMLE Step 1 scoring change. Methods: This is a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study that examines the motivations and barriers that medical students face in conducting academic or clinical research. A survey study based on a modified questionnaire for medical students was distributed to second-year medical students at a single institution. Mann-Whitney tests were used to analyze differences in attitudes across various subgroups and Pearson correlations quantified the strength of relationships. A thematic analysis was used to examine the qualitative data set. Results: 68 students completed the survey, 35 male and 32 female, and one failed to select an option. 39 students (57.3%) indicated that the USMLE Step 1 transition to pass/fail has influenced their attitudes and beliefs about conducting research in medical school. The most frequently endorsed motivation for medical student research participation was to be more competitive for residency applications [(65/68), 95.6%]. The most frequently endorsed barrier was lack of time [(59/68), 86.8%]. Research participation is correlated with research output ( Conclusions: Medical students perceive research participation and productivity as an increasingly important differentiating factor in competitive residency applications as USMLE Step 1 transitions to pass/fail. However, lack of time to engage in research poses a barrier for many students. Efforts that support student endeavors in academic or clinical research are a crucial aspect of the medical school curriculum and should focus on streamlining student research participation as the preclinical curriculum shortens across medical schools. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02508-3.

Indexed as

Medical student sesearchUndergraduate medical education and USMLE step 1

Identifiers

PMID41798367
PMCPMC12960994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.