Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798343›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Navigating Medical Curriculum Renewal: Faculty Experiences of Implementing a Renewed Assessment Plan Through the Lens of Change Theory.

Rhoda Meyer, Karin Baatjes, Liezl Smit, Elize Archer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rhoda MeyerFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Professions Education, Stellenbosch University, Parow, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2905-5385
Karin BaatjesDivision of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Parow, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8432-8844
Liezl SmitFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Parow, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4843-9875
Elize ArcherFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Professions Education, Stellenbosch University, Parow, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-3730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curriculum renewal in medical education has received significant attention in recent years. While contemporary literature has highlighted various recommendations to guide curriculum renewal, an important perspective remains underexplored-the experiences of faculty who are responsible for implementing these changes. In this article, we provide insights into faculty's experiences of the change process as they implement a renewed assessment plan for a medical programme, offering some recommendations for faculty development. A qualitative interpretivist approach was used. Focus group discussions were conducted with faculty who are teaching and assessing students on the first three modules in the renewed medical curriculum. A three-tiered approach suggested by Miles and Huberman guided the analysis of the data. Coding was inductive and thematic. Four themes were identified, namely the nature of change, a commitment to changing the purpose of assessment, the need for collaboration in taking the plan forward and the need for a culture that supports learning. The findings suggest that while there are various challenges associated with the implementation of the renewed assessment plan, faculty were generally invested in the process. Furthermore, there is a distinct call to advance faculty development to support skills required to undertake assessment renewal.

Indexed as

Assessment renewalChange leadershipCurriculum renewalFaculty developmentMedical education

Identifiers

PMID41798343
PMCPMC12960880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.