Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798334›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Influence of Faculty-Derived Concept Maps on Student Study Strategies.

Kaitlin P Hardy, Amanda K Burbage, Julie A Kerry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaitlin P HardyMacon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences Eastern Virginia Medical School at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA USA.
Amanda K BurbageDepartment of Medical and Health Professions Education, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences EVMS School of Health Professions at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1208-8698
Julie A KerryDepartment of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences Eastern Virginia Medical School at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9471-839X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Concept mapping is a well-established tool for students to actively organize information into a visual and spatial framework. However, some students are resistant to adopting concept mapping as a study strategy due to the time and effort involved in generating the maps. In this study, we explored student perceptions of faculty-derived concept maps (FD-maps) developed to accompany content within a Foundational Science module in a medical school curriculum. We subsequently investigated whether student use of FD-maps helped overcome resistance to adoption of concept mapping. Methods: Student evaluation data was analyzed using a mixed methods approach to explore student perceptions of FD-maps. Based on this analysis, we deployed a survey to M1 (26% response rate) and M2 students (20% response rate) to assess the impact of FD-maps on subsequent use of concept mapping. Data from the survey was analyzed by binary logistic regression, and the Wald test was used to analyze predictor variable effects on the outcome. Results: Students perceived the FD-maps as helpful, allowing them to streamline their studying and helping them organize and make connections between the module content. Survey analysis found that overall student use of concept mapping increased after completion of the Foundational Science module. In addition, ranking the importance of the FD-maps in their studying and annotation of the FD-maps increased the adoption of concept mapping in subsequent modules. Conclusions: Students perceived FD-maps as helpful to their learning, and their utilization led to increased implementation of concept mapping by students. Thus, FD-maps may partially aid in overcoming barriers to students adopting concept maps as part of their overall study strategies.

Indexed as

Active learningCognitive integrationConcept mapping

Identifiers

PMID41798334
PMCPMC12961089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.