Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798316›Full record

ArticleACM computing surveys2022

Data Structures to Represent a Set of

Rayan Chikhi, Jan Holub, Paul Medvedev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM computing surveys, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Efficiency of Learned Indexes on Genome Spectra.LIPIcs : Leibniz international proceedings in informatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Fast, parallel, and cache-friendly suffix array construction.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2024
    Article
  10. PLA-index: AAlgorithms in bioinformatics : ... International Workshop, WABI ..., proceedings. WABI (Workshop) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sparse and skew hashing of K-mers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rayan ChikhiCenter of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics and Integrative Biology.
Jan HolubDepartment of Theoretical Computer Science, Czech Technical University in Prague.
Paul MedvedevCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

Funding

Y Chromosome EvolutionR01GM130691 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI MAKOVA, KATERYNA · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of biological sequencing data has been one of the biggest applications of string algorithms. The approaches used in many such applications are based on the analysis of

Indexed as

biological sequencing dataBloom filtersdata structuresde Bruijn graphsFM-indexk-mersk-mer setsnavigational data structuresunitgs

Identifiers

PMID41798316
PMCPMC12965495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.