ArticleIEEE signal processing magazine2025
The Marriage of Neurotechnologies and Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, regulatory, and technological aspects.
Article in IEEE signal processing magazine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive sovereignty and neuro-justice: neurotechnological advancements and mental autonomy in the Global South.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dual concepts of neurotechnology and artificial intelligence (AI) form an intriguing but also potentially explosive mixture because of its many ethical and legal implications. The advent of AI and the progress in neurotechnologies are reshaping the landscape not only in all scientific fields but also in everyday life both individually and collectively, ushering in a new era where the centrality, integrity and identity of humans is no longer a fact. Such tumultuous progress has implications at all levels, individual, societal, economical and political. Without the pretension of exploring the whole set of relevant aspects, we aim at providing a multi-disciplinary view on the main ethical, legal and societal issues stemming from neurotechnology and AI, by assessing them using keywords like trustworthiness, fairness, awareness, security, and privacy. In this paper, we propose an overview on the current scenario, taking a philosophical perspective in the light of ethics, and boiling it down to aspects closely related to the technological developments and the regulatory measures that are currently in-place and called for.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.