ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
An interpretability heart disease prediction model based on stacking ensemble with SHAP.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the big data era, healthcare data has grown exponentially, presenting opportunities to explore the pathogenesis of heart disease. Clarifying the correlations between health indicators and heart disease is crucial for early prevention. This study employs ensemble learning to identify the key influencing factors, assisting clinicians in understanding the pathogenesis and enhancing prediction strategies. Methods: A two-layer stacking ensemble model is proposed, integrating Naive Bayes, Decision Trees, CatBoost and Gradient Boosting Trees to enhance prediction accuracy. To address ensemble models' complexity and poor interpretability, the SHAP technique is introduced to visualize the decision-making logic of the ensemble model. Results: Experimental results show that the stacking model achieved 86.69% accuracy, 87.14% weighted precision, 86.69% weighted recall, and 86.91% weighted F1-score. It balances precision and recall, unlike single learners that prioritize one over the other. Global interpretive analysis demonstrates that age, sleep duration, self-rated health status and BMI are critical factors in assessing cardiovascular risk. Local interpretive analysis is conducted to evaluate the contribution of each feature to the prediction results of individual samples. Discussion: The stacking model's superior performance demonstrates that ensemble learning can overcome the limitations of single learners. Additionally, key predictive factors are identified: maintaining an average sleep duration of 7-8 hours significantly reduces heart disease risk, while advanced age and poor health status increase susceptibility. This study provides a reliable predictive tool for personalized heart disease prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.