ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
State of the AI: Post-Deployment Monitoring of Radiology-Focused Internally Developed AI.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical AI Beyond Development: A Scoping Review of Deployment-Related Robustness, Algorithmovigilance, and Lifecycle Oversight.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Federated artificial intelligence monitoring service (FAMOS): an in silico feasibility study.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Articles on the development of medical image artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are numerous in the literature, but deployment to clinical practice is infrequently discussed. The Enterprise Radiology Framework for AI Software Technology Team at Mayo Clinic has been focused on bridging the gap in clinical translation of medical image AI algorithms since its inception in 2019. During this time, we have released 17 algorithms into our radiology clinical practice. Recently, we have placed an increased focus on monitoring these algorithms, as there are few reports with practical experience documented in the literature. Our increased monitoring efforts include daily, weekly, and yearly monitoring of utilization, failure modes, data drift, and end-user feedback through automated alerts, dedicated dashboards, and pointed investigations to enable optimal algorithmic processing. End-user feedback is elicited yearly during annual reviews to ensure clinical needs are still being met. Automated monitoring has enabled earlier identification of problems, such as images no longer routing through the orchestration engine to the appropriate algorithm, minimizing potential disruption to the clinical practice and ensuring continued algorithmic utilization. Monitoring has also reinforced the importance of key aspects of interdisciplinary research and translation, such as early discussions on clinical needs coupled with technological ability and proper training. By providing our experience in and continuing to improve monitoring methods as a community, we can all minimize risk and maximize the benefits of medical pixel-based AI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.