ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2026
Minimally invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgeons are often faced with complex decision-making when deciding on the optimum surgical management of thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures. The magnitude of surgical techniques is vast from standard open techniques to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). In recent years, the application of MIS has grown in popularity in parallel to impressive technological advances. In this narrative review, we discuss the available literature focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques for TL burst fractures. The aim of this article is to help guide spinal surgeons who wish to include MIS as part of their surgical portfolio and to identify remaining knowledge gaps. We aimed to present a review on the choice of long vs short construct, cement augmentation techniques, reduction and realignment techniques, surgical nuances in incomplete (A3) versus complete (A4) burst fractures, as well as discuss the role of implant removal. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation including the index fracture level and subsequent implant removal has shown promise for the surgical treatment of TL AO Type A3 fractures, and A4 fractures. This technique may be best considered as internal bracing while fracture heals with the prototypical patient being a young active individual without severe kyphotic deformity. These techniques can be enhanced with cement augmentation as well as reduction and realignment techniques. With ongoing technological advancement, the armentarium of MIS surgical techniques applicable to TL burst fractures will certainly continue to expand. Despite rapid technological advances, a comprehensive understanding of optimal application of those techniques is lacking creating knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.