ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
Factors associated with decision-making capacity in persons with mental illnesses: Baseline findings of a prospective study.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Decision-making capacity (DMC) is central to informed consent and patient autonomy in psychiatric practice. While impaired DMC is common among inpatients, the relative contributions of insight, severity of illness (SoI), and socio-demographic factors remain less explored, particularly in the low- and middle-income countries. Aim: To identify the socio-demographic and clinical correlates of DMC among psychiatric inpatients at the time of admission. Methods: Psychiatric inpatients ( Results: Family history of psychiatric illness, being single, absent clinical insight and higher SoI (BPRS > 31) showed significant association with incapacity at baseline. In multivariable models, higher grades of clinical insight alone showed 85-times more likelihood for preserved DMC; and upon including SoI into the model-lower BPRS scores ≤31 showed 33-times more likelihood to have preserved DMC, while higher grades of insight further increased the likelihood to 139-fold, after adjusting for other variables. Overall, insight and SoI accounted for 91% of the variance, with an overall classification accuracy of 97.4%. ROC and PRC analysis identified an insight grade ≥2 as the optimal cut-off, with 87.3% precision, 94.8% sensitivity (recall), and 95.4% specificity. Conclusion: Clinical insight (≥2) is the strongest correlate of preserved DMC in psychiatric inpatients, with SoI (BPRS ≤ 31) providing an additional influence, at baseline. Routine context-specific structured assessments of insight and SoI should be integrated into psychiatric evaluations for DMC to improve objectivity, and support patient autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.