Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798235›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026

Factors associated with decision-making capacity in persons with mental illnesses: Baseline findings of a prospective study.

Ranganath R Kulkarni, Swapna A Pandurangi, Pratibha R Kulkarni, N Aman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ranganath R KulkarniDepartment of Psychiatry, Dharwad Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Swapna A PandurangiDepartment of Psychiatry, Dharwad Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Pratibha R KulkarniDepartment of Forensic Medicine, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
N AmanJJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Decision-making capacity (DMC) is central to informed consent and patient autonomy in psychiatric practice. While impaired DMC is common among inpatients, the relative contributions of insight, severity of illness (SoI), and socio-demographic factors remain less explored, particularly in the low- and middle-income countries. Aim: To identify the socio-demographic and clinical correlates of DMC among psychiatric inpatients at the time of admission. Methods: Psychiatric inpatients ( Results: Family history of psychiatric illness, being single, absent clinical insight and higher SoI (BPRS > 31) showed significant association with incapacity at baseline. In multivariable models, higher grades of clinical insight alone showed 85-times more likelihood for preserved DMC; and upon including SoI into the model-lower BPRS scores ≤31 showed 33-times more likelihood to have preserved DMC, while higher grades of insight further increased the likelihood to 139-fold, after adjusting for other variables. Overall, insight and SoI accounted for 91% of the variance, with an overall classification accuracy of 97.4%. ROC and PRC analysis identified an insight grade ≥2 as the optimal cut-off, with 87.3% precision, 94.8% sensitivity (recall), and 95.4% specificity. Conclusion: Clinical insight (≥2) is the strongest correlate of preserved DMC in psychiatric inpatients, with SoI (BPRS ≤ 31) providing an additional influence, at baseline. Routine context-specific structured assessments of insight and SoI should be integrated into psychiatric evaluations for DMC to improve objectivity, and support patient autonomy.

Indexed as

Autonomycapacity assessmentinsightmental capacityMental Healthcare Act 2017psychiatric disordersseverity of illness

Identifiers

PMID41798235
PMCPMC12965427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.