ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2026
Likelihood and Predictors of Acute Findings on CTA Head and Neck for Neurologic Presentations to the Emergency Department.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: CT angiography of the head and neck (CTAHN) is commonly obtained in the emergency department (ED) for patients with acute neurologic symptoms to guide interventions. There are limited data on which clinical characteristics predict these changes. The primary objective of this study was to assess the yield of CTAHN across common neurologic ED presentations and identify patient and clinical factors associated with CTAHN findings that result in acute management change. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1,445 ED patients at an academic Level 1 trauma center who underwent CTAHN in 2023 for 5 common neurologic presentations: stroke code, headache, dizziness, altered mental status, and vision changes. Multivariable logistic regression models with LASSO variable selection were used to identify predictors of acute management change. Odds ratios (OR), 95% CIs, and Results: Overall, 216 of 1,445 CTA head and neck sudies (CTAHNs; 14.9%) resulted in acute management change. The highest yield of CTAHN acute management change was for stroke codes (21.2%) and vision changes (14.7%), and the lowest for dizziness (4.0%). For stroke codes, independent predictors included abnormal CT head (OR 2.84, Discussion: These results highlight specific, obtainable clinical predictors that can guide judicious use of CTAHN in the ED. Recognizing these predictors can inform emergency physicians' and neurologists' clinical judgment, optimize imaging utilization, improve resource allocation, and reduce patient burden.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.