SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Included studies assessed treatment outcomes using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled proportions. Results: A total of 14 studies with 1844 patients were included. The pooled disease control rate (DCR) was 87.6% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 82.5%-92%), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 32.2% (95% CI, 25.4%-39.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 30.87 months (95% CI, 22.71-39.04), and median overall survival (OS) was 51.85 months (95% CI, 39.99-63.71). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly higher DCR in grade 1-2 NETs 97.7% (95% CI, 91.4%-100%) compared to grade 3 NETs 90.8% (95% CI, 85.1%-94.4%), and a higher ORR in grade 1-2 tumors 45.4% (95% CI, 35.3%-55.6%) compared to grade 3 tumors 27.1% (95% CI, 21.2%-33.4%). PFS was longer in pancreatic NETs 93.9 months (95% CI, 39.45-148.35) than in gastrointestinal NETs 66.32 months (95% CI, 41.78-90.87). The overall incidence of adverse events was 4.1%, with grade ≥3 toxicities in 4.3%. Conclusion: Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251047030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.