ArticleISME communications2026
A novel method to simultaneously estimate bacterial respiration and growth from oxygen dynamics.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ecological acclimation of microbial communities to rising temperatures: growth, respiration, and interactions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial growth and respiration are fundamental metabolic processes that drive energy transformation and allocation within organisms and impact carbon sequestration at the ecosystem scale. However, these traits are usually measured independently; bacterial growth is quantified with endpoint biomass measurements, while respiration is determined by monitoring oxygen or carbon dioxide. Because the two physiological traits are collected at different temporal and volumetric scales (hours-to-days for growth versus minutes-to-hours for respiration), reconciling them is challenging and often introduces scale-mismatch bias, obscuring causal links between metabolism and environmental drivers. In this study, we develop a novel method for quantifying the rates of bacterial growth and respiration from a single dissolved-oxygen time series. Our approach introduces a model that couples exponential biomass growth with biomass-specific respiration, enabling simultaneous inference of growth rate and respiration rate from each oxygen trajectory. We applied our high-throughput method to 15 bacterial taxa isolated from natural environments. Our approach yielded growth estimates in close agreement with measurements based on popular methods using optical density or flow cytometry ([Formula: see text] > 0.9) with no evidence of taxon-specific bias. We also tested our approach in quantifying the effects of temperature on respiration, growth, and carbon use-efficiency in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.