Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798180›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

A novel method to simultaneously estimate bacterial respiration and growth from oxygen dynamics.

Ilgaz Cakin, Rebecca Millington, Samraat Pawar, Angus Buckling, Nicholas Smirnoff, Daniel Padfield, John Duffy, Gabriel Yvon-Durocher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilgaz CakinLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-8347
Rebecca MillingtonPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Pl, Plymouth PL1 3DH, England, United Kingdom.
Samraat PawarDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, England, United Kingdom.
Angus BucklingCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, SERFS, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, England, United Kingdom.
Nicholas SmirnoffDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope Building, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-5602
Daniel PadfieldDepartment of Ecology and Conservation, Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-9670
John DuffyLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, England, United Kingdom.
Gabriel Yvon-DurocherLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, England, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial growth and respiration are fundamental metabolic processes that drive energy transformation and allocation within organisms and impact carbon sequestration at the ecosystem scale. However, these traits are usually measured independently; bacterial growth is quantified with endpoint biomass measurements, while respiration is determined by monitoring oxygen or carbon dioxide. Because the two physiological traits are collected at different temporal and volumetric scales (hours-to-days for growth versus minutes-to-hours for respiration), reconciling them is challenging and often introduces scale-mismatch bias, obscuring causal links between metabolism and environmental drivers. In this study, we develop a novel method for quantifying the rates of bacterial growth and respiration from a single dissolved-oxygen time series. Our approach introduces a model that couples exponential biomass growth with biomass-specific respiration, enabling simultaneous inference of growth rate and respiration rate from each oxygen trajectory. We applied our high-throughput method to 15 bacterial taxa isolated from natural environments. Our approach yielded growth estimates in close agreement with measurements based on popular methods using optical density or flow cytometry ([Formula: see text] > 0.9) with no evidence of taxon-specific bias. We also tested our approach in quantifying the effects of temperature on respiration, growth, and carbon use-efficiency in

Indexed as

bacterial growth ratebacterial respirationmechanistic modellingmicrobial energy allocationoxygen dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41798180
PMCPMC12963047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.