Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798125›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2026

Self-reported physical functioning and physical fitness in glioma patients.

Marieke E C Blom, Maxine Gorter, Vera Belgers, Jantine G Röttgering, Philip C de Witt Hamer, Johanna M Niers, Marike R van Lingen, Mona L M Zimmermann, Hans Knoop, Martin Klein and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marieke E C BlomCancer Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0110-6861
Maxine GorterCancer Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-3625
Vera BelgersAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neurology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5980-8202
Jantine G RöttgeringAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip C de Witt HamerAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neurosurgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna M NiersAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neurology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-8247
Marike R van LingenAmsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mona L M ZimmermannAmsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans KnoopAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7763-3517
Martin KleinAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-7911
Linda DouwAmsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-4062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knowledge about glioma patients' physical functioning and physical fitness throughout the disease trajectory is limited. We analyzed self-reported functioning and fitness in a large sample of glioma patients preoperatively and after primary treatment. Methods: We used the physical functioning subscale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36) and three questions about physical fitness from the Checklist of Individual Strength (CIS20). Scores were compared to age-, sex-, and education-matched population controls, preoperatively and after treatment. In patients with repeated assessments, changes over time were analyzed. Correlations between patient, disease, and treatment characteristics and functioning and fitness at both time points, and with change over time, were explored. Analyses were performed separately for World Health Organization grade II, III, and IV glioma. Results: Grade III patients had significantly lower functioning than controls, both preoperatively and after treatment, and declined over time. No significant differences with controls were found for grade II and IV patients, or for fitness. Grade II patients reported better functioning than grade III and IV preoperatively and better than grade III after treatment. Lower Karnofsky Performance Status was generally related to lower functioning and fitness, while older age, female sex, and lower education appeared in subgroup analyses. Age, neurological disabilities and tumor histology were associated with changes over time. Conclusions: Grade III glioma patients showed poorer functioning than population controls, which declined over time. Grade II patients reported better outcomes than the other subgroups, although individual variability was high. These findings highlight the need for personalized approaches addressing functioning and fitness in glioma.

Indexed as

brain tumorsgliomaphysical fitnessphysical functioning

Identifiers

PMID41798125
PMCPMC12965659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.