ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2026
Self-reported physical functioning and physical fitness in glioma patients.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promoting physical activity in glioma patients: Insights from Dutch healthcare professionals.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knowledge about glioma patients' physical functioning and physical fitness throughout the disease trajectory is limited. We analyzed self-reported functioning and fitness in a large sample of glioma patients preoperatively and after primary treatment. Methods: We used the physical functioning subscale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF36) and three questions about physical fitness from the Checklist of Individual Strength (CIS20). Scores were compared to age-, sex-, and education-matched population controls, preoperatively and after treatment. In patients with repeated assessments, changes over time were analyzed. Correlations between patient, disease, and treatment characteristics and functioning and fitness at both time points, and with change over time, were explored. Analyses were performed separately for World Health Organization grade II, III, and IV glioma. Results: Grade III patients had significantly lower functioning than controls, both preoperatively and after treatment, and declined over time. No significant differences with controls were found for grade II and IV patients, or for fitness. Grade II patients reported better functioning than grade III and IV preoperatively and better than grade III after treatment. Lower Karnofsky Performance Status was generally related to lower functioning and fitness, while older age, female sex, and lower education appeared in subgroup analyses. Age, neurological disabilities and tumor histology were associated with changes over time. Conclusions: Grade III glioma patients showed poorer functioning than population controls, which declined over time. Grade II patients reported better outcomes than the other subgroups, although individual variability was high. These findings highlight the need for personalized approaches addressing functioning and fitness in glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.