ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2026
Prognostic factors in adult patients with medulloblastoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medulloblastoma (MB) is a rare tumor in adults, with treatment strategies derived largely from pediatric data. Prognostic factors have not been uniformly defined in adults to date. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 89 adult MB patients treated between 1995 and 2019 in our institution. Patient's characteristics, disease features, and treatment modalities were analyzed for prognostic factors using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Of the 89 patients, 66% were male. Most MBs were in the cerebellum (48%), with desmoplastic/nodular histology (43%), Sonic Hedgehog molecular type (79%), and M0 Chang´s stage (72%). Intermediate- and high-risk MBs were identified in ~46% and ~47% of cases, respectively. Complete/near complete tumor resection was achieved in 62% of cases. Surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy (CT/RT) was the most frequent treatment (76%) with carboplatin-based regimens used in 70% of cases. After the first-line treatment, complete response (CR) was achieved in 80% of patients. Median overall survival (mOS) was 124.4 months (95%CI 68.5-180.1) and the median progression free survival (mPFS) was 30.5 months (95%CI 13.5-47.5), the 5-year OS was 67% and the 5-year PFS was 51%. In multivariate analysis, Chang´s stage ≥ M2 metastatic classification ( Conclusions: Chang's stage ≥ M2, first-line treatment lacking CT, and first-line treatment with craniospinal RT < 30 Gy were significant predictors of poor survival. Chemoradiotherapy with craniospinal RT ≥ 30 Gy improved survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.