ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2026
Health-related quality of life outcomes of surgery for diffuse glioma: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although progress has been made in understanding the effects of adjuvant therapy on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in diffuse glioma patients, less is known about the impact of surgical resection. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and pooled quantitative analysis. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched for studies measuring HR-QoL before and after surgery for WHO grade 2-4 adult-type diffuse gliomas. Inclusion was limited to prospective cohort studies and trials on adults with ≥1 month of postoperative follow-up. Metric outcomes were assessed with pooled odds, competing risk analysis, and meta-regression using a random effects model. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Results: Twelve studies comprising 1000 patients were included. The pooled odds of an unfavorable versus favorable HR-QoL change compared to baseline was not significantly different from 1 within 3 months of surgery (0.843, 95% CI, 0.339-2.100), but significantly less than 1 at final follow-up (0.481, 95% CI, 0.260-0.888). The cumulative incidence of favorable HR-QoL change was significantly higher than that of unfavorable change, with the incidence curves separating after 3 months (χ Conclusion: Surgical resection can maintain or improve HR-QoL, but patients at risk of deterioration should be identified early. Future studies must carefully select and interpret HR-QoL instruments, as preference-based and non-preference-based tools may lack comparability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.