Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798092›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2026

What leads to vaccine compliance? Evidence from healthcare workers.

Alessandro Demichelis, Marco Marini, Dario Menicagli, Giovanna Mancini, Ennio Bilancini, Folco Panizza, Tommaso Bellandi, Leonardo Boncinelli, Paolo Pin, Giacomo Galletti and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alessandro DemichelisIMT Scuola Alti Studi Lucca, Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-0608
Marco MariniIMT Scuola Alti Studi Lucca, Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5466-8194
Dario MenicagliIMT Scuola Alti Studi Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Giovanna ManciniIMT Scuola Alti Studi Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Ennio BilanciniIMT Scuola Alti Studi Lucca, Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2027-3992
Folco PanizzaIMT Scuola Alti Studi Lucca, Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5178-5926
Tommaso BellandiAzienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3087-1822
Leonardo BoncinelliUniversità degli studi di Firenze, Toscana, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-5133
Paolo PinUniversità degli studi di Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-4947
Giacomo GallettiAgenzia Regionale di Sanità Toscana, Firenze, Italy.
Roberta CaldesiAzienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Arezzo, Italy.
Gustavo CevolaniIMT Scuola Alti Studi Lucca, Lucca, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-8877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a problematic phenomenon for vaccination campaigns. It played a significant role during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, where the role of HealthCare Workers (HCW) was particularly relevant. Understanding the motivation of HCW regarding vaccines is, therefore, paramount. Design and methods: We presented an online questionnaire to 5283 Italian HCW to investigate the role played by personal reasons and the potential perception of risk, the social environment, and the vaccine efficacy and safety perception in affecting HCW willingness to adhere to the vaccination campaign. Results: First, we discovered that those who took the vaccine to minimize health risk tended to vaccinate earlier, whereas those who did it due to social pressure received it later. Second, that those who indicated acquaintances as more important than the workplace in their vaccination choice showed more altruistic-related reasons to vaccinate, and the reverse held true. Third, that regarding two salient features of the vaccine, namely safety and efficacy, only the former was playing a role in the willingness to vaccinate, whereas the latter did not show an impact. Conclusions: The lessons that can be taken from these results are that future communication campaigns that push toward a timely vaccination should focus less on the social pressure, especially the one related to work environments, and more on the internal motivations of workers. Moreover, we can conclude that emphasizing the safety features of vaccines tend to play a more significant role in shaping vaccine behaviors than emphasizing efficacy.

Indexed as

Covid-19healthcare workersrisk perceptionvaccination campaignvaccine hesitancyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID41798092
PMCPMC12966512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.