ArticleJournal of public health research2026
What leads to vaccine compliance? Evidence from healthcare workers.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- I want to be safe: understanding the main drivers behind vaccination choice throughout the pandemic.BMC public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a problematic phenomenon for vaccination campaigns. It played a significant role during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, where the role of HealthCare Workers (HCW) was particularly relevant. Understanding the motivation of HCW regarding vaccines is, therefore, paramount. Design and methods: We presented an online questionnaire to 5283 Italian HCW to investigate the role played by personal reasons and the potential perception of risk, the social environment, and the vaccine efficacy and safety perception in affecting HCW willingness to adhere to the vaccination campaign. Results: First, we discovered that those who took the vaccine to minimize health risk tended to vaccinate earlier, whereas those who did it due to social pressure received it later. Second, that those who indicated acquaintances as more important than the workplace in their vaccination choice showed more altruistic-related reasons to vaccinate, and the reverse held true. Third, that regarding two salient features of the vaccine, namely safety and efficacy, only the former was playing a role in the willingness to vaccinate, whereas the latter did not show an impact. Conclusions: The lessons that can be taken from these results are that future communication campaigns that push toward a timely vaccination should focus less on the social pressure, especially the one related to work environments, and more on the internal motivations of workers. Moreover, we can conclude that emphasizing the safety features of vaccines tend to play a more significant role in shaping vaccine behaviors than emphasizing efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.