ArticleInternational journal of genomics2026
Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Dynamic Cellular Interactions and Molecular Mechanisms in Myocardial Infarction Recovery.
Article in International journal of genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NEAT1 Coordinates a PDLIM5-CACNA1C Regulatory Program Associated with a Potentially Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyocyte State in the Border Zone During Early Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Dynamic Cellular Interactions and Molecular Mechanisms in Myocardial Infarction Recovery.International journal of genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Repair and remodeling following myocardial infarction (MI) are complex processes with a wide array of cellular and molecular mechanisms; however, the cell source mediating repair is still poorly understood in terms of heterogeneity and temporal dynamics. Methods: We performed a single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of cardiac tissues from different time points post-MI, as well as in gene knockout (ChrisKO) and health control groups. The data were mined by UMAP and t-SNE dimension reduction visualization, pseudotime trajectory analysis, cell communication network analysis, and gene expression pattern cluster. Results: A collection of cell types contributing to cardiac repair was identified, including fibroblasts, macrophages, endothelial cells, and cardiomyocytes that each expressed gene markers and showed temporal distributions associated with distinct injury phases. Pseudotime trajectory analysis identified a continuous change in cellular state from inflammatory to reparative phase, with immune cells in early stages and tissue repair cells at latter stages. The activation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) signaling pathway is highly involved in repair after MI, where chemokine-secreting cells and cardiac fibroblasts act as major MIF signal sources. Network analysis of the intercellular communication revealed that macrophages are key orchestrators of repair. When analyzing branch-specific gene expression, we found that several important regulatory factors including Atpdv1h, Lypla1, Mrpl15, Tcea1, Apoa, Cldn1, Dpep1, and Map had changing trends at different phases during regeneration. Conclusion: Our study profiled a panoramic landscape of cellular and molecular dynamics after MI at single-cell resolution, demonstrating key cell communication networks and regulatory genes that present novel targets for developing therapeutic strategy toward cardiac repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.