ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science
Identification of effective weaning through diaphragmatic ultrasound added to clinical parameters among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit at a tertiary care center: A prospective observational study.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective and timely weaning is essential for improving the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study was conducted to determine whether diaphragmatic thickness fraction measured by ultrasound provides any additional benefit when combined with clinical parameters for successful weaning. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on 100 mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. When the criteria for weaning were satisfactorily fulfilled, a spontaneous breathing trial was administered. Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) and bedside ultrasound to measure diaphragmatic thickness fraction (DTF) were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RSBI and DTF were calculated utilizing a cutoff value of RSBI <82 and a DTF cutoff of >37%. The predictability of weaning success was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Of the 100 patients observed, 68 patients had weaning success while 32 patients experienced weaning failure. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RSBI were greater compared to DTF (88.23%, 96.87%, 98.36%, and 79.48% vs. 88.23%, 84.37%, 92.30%, and 77.14% respectively). The AUROC values for RSBI, DTF, and their combination were 0.86, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient of RSBI with DTF was found to be -0.475. Conclusion: RSBI proved to be a highly reliable predictor of successful weaning, demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy. The combination of RSBI and DTF improved the diagnostic validity profile, suggesting that integration of diaphragmatic ultrasound with conventional clinical indices enhances the reliability of weaning assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.