Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798047›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science

To compare the effect of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine spray at the surgical site during closure in lumbar spine fixation surgery for postoperative pain relief: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Annamalaei, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Singh, Birju Manjhi, Arun Raj Pandey, Bikram Kumar Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

AnnamalaeiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Atul Kumar SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Yashpal SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Birju ManjhiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arun Raj PandeyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Bikram Kumar GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spine surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain due to the extensive handling of tissue and bone. Multimodal analgesia is the preferred choice but is associated with systemic side effects. Atomized drugs at the local surgical site may be a more attractive option than the intravenous route. In this study, we compare the atomized form of ketamine and dexmedetomidine at the surgical site for postoperative pain relief in lumbar spine surgeries. Methods: After approval from institutional ethics committee and the Clinical Trial Registry - India, 45 patients of age group between 18 and 60 years, scheduled for lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia were divided into three equal groups: Group D: Received dexmedetomidine 1 µ/kg, Group K: Received Ketamine 1 mg/kg and Group N: Received 20 ml of normal saline. Drugs were diluted in 20 mL of normal saline and applied over the surgical site at the end of the surgery, before closure, in the form of fine droplets using an atomizer device. Our primary outcome was the postoperative analgesia measured by the Visual Analog Scale. Results: Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the ketamine group, 240 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 120-360) than the dexmedetomidine group, 120 min (IQR: 120-240) determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test ( Conclusion: Atomized ketamine and dexmedetomidine at the surgical site during closure in lumbar spine fixation surgery is an attractive choice for postoperative pain relief without any systemic side effects.

Indexed as

Dexmedetomidineketaminelumbar spine surgerypostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID41798047
PMCPMC12962446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.