ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese adapted and revised food allergy self-efficacy scale for parents.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Food allergy (FA) in Chinese children is a growing public health concern. Parental FA self-efficacy, characterized by parents' confidence in managing children's FA, correlates with parental and children's wellbeing. However, there is currently no Chinese valid scale for measuring the parental FA self-efficacy. This study culturally adapted and revised the Food Allergy Self-Efficacy Scale for Parents (FASE-P) into Chinese, and examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese adapted and revised FASE-P (CAR-FASE-P). Methods: Cross-cultural adaptation of the FASE-P was firstly conducted through forward translation, back translation, expert consultation and cognitive interview with parents of FA children. To assess the psychometric properties, a total of 372 parents of FA children were recruited in the outpatient clinic of hospitals in Jinan, Shandong, China, and 30 parents participated in the retest. Item analysis, validity (including content validity, structural validity and criterion-related validity) and reliability (including internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability) of the CAR-FASE-P were examined. Results: After two rounds of expert panel reviews, adequate content validity of the preliminary CAR-FASE-P was confirmed, with the item-level content validity index ranging from 0.800 to 1.000 and the scale-level content validity index of 0.944. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors accounting for 66.074% of the total variance. The modified confirmatory factor analysis model demonstrated that the 5-factor model fitted the data well (χ Conclusion: Evaluated in a Chinese sample, the CAR-FASE-P demonstrated preliminary evidence for validity and reliability, suggesting its potential utility for assessing parental self-efficacy in food allergy management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.