Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798017›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

An empirical study on the intentions and behaviors of non-art majors in continuously selecting esthetic education courses: integration of ECM and TPB.

Haoran Li, Jiahao Li, Xingchen Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haoran LiSchool of Arts, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiahao LiSchool of Art and Design, Yantai Nanshan University, Yantai, China.
Xingchen FanBeijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore non-art majors' intentions and behaviors of non-art majors concerning their ongoing enrollment in esthetic education courses, we constructed a theoretical framework integrating ECM and TPB for empirical analysis. The study surveyed undergraduate, master's, and doctoral students from the comprehensive universities in China. Questionnaires were collected from 519 students selected in esthetic education courses during the second semester of 2024, and integrated structural equation modeling was employed for testing. Analysis reveals that students' positive attitudes toward esthetic education courses and their perceived feasibility of selection are core variables affecting persistent selection intents. Furthermore, expectation confirmation and satisfaction with esthetic education courses indirectly influence sustained selection intentions. Overall, this study provides evidence that the integrated model offers greater explanatory power for non-art majors' intentions and behaviors regarding continued selection in esthetic education courses compared to any single model considered in isolation. This establishes a comprehensive theoretical framework for in-depth research on the intentions and behaviors of non-art majors regarding continued selection in esthetic education courses. Simultaneously, it offers practical insights for those aiming to enhance the development, promotion, and management of esthetic education courses at comprehensive universities.

Indexed as

comprehensive universitiescontinued intention to course selectionesthetic education coursesexpectation-confirmation modelnon-art majorstheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID41798017
PMCPMC12963004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.