ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Optimising pain management in intensive care setting: Insights from a realist evaluation.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inconsistent pain management in intensive care settings contributes to poor patient outcomes and prolonged hospital stays. Implementing evidence-based pain management strategies is critical to mitigating complications, such as oversedation and excessive analgesia. The process is inherently complex, requiring an exploration of contextual factors that enable implementation, the mechanisms triggered within these contexts, and strategies to enhance stakeholder engagement. Objective: In this discussion paper, we examined sociocultural, organisational, professional, and individual factors influencing the implementation of pain management interventions in intensive care settings. We considered their implications for diverse stakeholders and have offered evidence-informed recommendations to strengthen implementation. Information Source: In this discussion we synthesise findings from a theory-driven, three-phase realist evaluation that examined and refined program theories related to successful implementation of pain management interventions. Phase one involved a scoping review of the literature and a survey with open-ended questions to elicit initial program theories. Phases two and three comprised a rapid realist review followed by stakeholder interviews to iteratively refine these theories. Results: Interventions succeed or fail not solely based on design but within complex contexts where knowledge, power, and professional identity intersect. Across micro, meso, and macro levels of care, mechanisms such as empowerment, moral distress, and institutional trust influenced intensive care nurses' willingness and capacity to adopt interventions. Biomedical hierarchies may marginalise nursing knowledge, while interprofessional hierarchies and organisational cultures can either constrain or enable meaningful change. Conclusion: We have advanced critical nursing scholarship by conceptualising pain management not merely as a clinical intervention but as a socially embedded practice. We have offered implications for educators, policymakers, nurse leaders, and practitioners to promote equitable, context-sensitive strategies for implementing pain management interventions, thereby possibly enhancing clinical practice and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.