ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Effectiveness, Safety, and Patient Satisfaction of Laparoscopic Uterosacral Nerve Ablation in Terms of Pain Relief in Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integration of Indocyanine Green Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Nerve Ablation: Advancements in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as intermittent or constant pain in the lower abdomen or pelvis for a duration of 6 months that is not exclusively associated with menstruation or sexual intercourse. Laparoscopic ablation of the nerve plexuses and ganglia in the uterosacral ligaments (laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation [LUNA]) is a viable treatment option. LUNA, if proven effective, may be a significant treatment amendment as an alternative to surgical therapy. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in LUNA in terms of pain relief in women with CPP in whom diagnostic laparoscopy failed to demonstrate an anatomical correlation. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we examined pseudonymized data of women who underwent laparoscopy for chronic pelvic. If there was a pathological correlation for the CPP, LUNA was performed and patients were asked to participated in a postsurgical questionnaire. They were asked about effectiveness, outcome, and satisfaction after LUNA. Results: The average age of the study population was 25.8 years. All women were premenopausal. When performing LUNA, postoperative pain tolerance improved significantly ( Conclusion: In our retrospective study, we were able to show a decrease of pain frequency and pain insensitivity for women with CPP who underwent LUNA. Further prospective randomized, double-blind studies are needed to test if LUNA as a surgical technique is an appropriate treatment option for CPP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.