ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Uterine-sparing Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women Aiming for Pregnancy.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is frequently encountered in elderly women. However, it can also affect relatively young women of reproductive age. Here, we present three cases of uterine-sparing robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) in women aiming for pregnancy. All cases were diagnosed with POP-Q stage III. Utilizing the da Vinci X or Xi robotic surgical system, they underwent uterine-sparing RSC with dual mesh anterior and posterior walls. The anterior wall mesh was not a Y-shaped mesh encircling the cervix; The anterior wall mesh was not a Y-shaped mesh encircling the cervix; rather, it was placed only through the window of the right broad ligament to minimize uterine artery compression caused by the mesh. No perioperative complications or short-term recurrences were noted. Uterine-sparing robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy represents a valuable surgical option for patients with POP who wish to become pregnant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.