ArticleThe British and Irish orthoptic journal2026
Effect of Chromostereoscopic Stimulus on Accommodative Response and Subjective Perception.
Article in The British and Irish orthoptic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The phenomenon of chromostereopsis, where colours are perceived at different depths due to the eye's optics, creates a potential conflict during accommodation. This prospective, cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the effect of different chromostereoscopic stimuli on the objective accommodative response and subjective user comfort. Methods: Thirty young, healthy adults (mean age 19.83 ± 1.18 years) read text passages presented on an iPad at a 50 cm viewing distance. Stimuli included red, green, blue, yellow, and mixed-colour text on a black background, compared to a standard black-on-white baseline. Accommodative lag was measured objectively using an open-field autorefractor, while subjective ratings of perceived depth and screen readability were collected via questionnaire. Results: A significant main effect of stimulus colour on accommodative lag was found (p < .001). The short-wavelength (blue) stimulus induced the greatest mean accommodative lag (0.61 D). Conversely, the long-wavelength (red) stimulus produced the smallest lag (0.18 D), indicating the most accurate accommodative focus. Subjective data strongly corroborated these findings, with blue being perceived as most distant and most difficult to read (76.67% and 73.33% of participants, respectively), while red was perceived as closest and yellow was perceived as the easiest to read (53.33%). Conclusion: Colour is a critical factor in visual ergonomics for dark-themed interfaces. A pure blue stimulus on a black background acts as a poor driver for accommodation, leading to significant focusing errors and a diminished perceptual experience. These findings provide a physiological basis for user interface design guidelines, suggesting that the use of short-wavelength, saturated text for reading tasks should be avoided to optimize visual comfort and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.