ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Exploring training-sleep characteristics and bidirectional lagged relationships in Chinese recreational runners: insights from a year-long wearable monitoring study.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore training and sleep characteristics among recreational runners, along with their interrelationships, to provide more scientific and personalised training guidance. Methods: Recreational runners wearing Garmin smartwatches were recruited, and continuous data on training and sleep were collected via the device Application Programming Interface from June 2024 to June 2025. Training data included pace, distance, duration, and heart rate, while sleep data included stage durations and nocturnal heart rate variability Linear mixed models were applied to examine differences in training and sleep characteristics across sex, performance classification, season, and day of the week, and to explore the effects of training load on subsequent sleep and the influence of sleep duration on training performance on the following day. Results: The average distance per training session was 12.10 ± 3.36 km, with an average pace of 6.02 ± 1.00 min/km. Male runners exhibited significantly faster paces and longer distances than females, and elite runners outperformed other groups across all training parameters. Significant seasonal and weekly variations were observed. Specifically, pace was slowest and distance shortest in summer, while training volume, intensity, and heart rate were higher on rest days than on workdays. The average nightly sleep duration was 6.61 ± 0.69 h, indicating general insufficiency. Female runners had significantly longer deep sleep than males, and elite runners showed a more pronounced early sleep-wake rhythm. A bidirectional relationship was identified, with the finding that high training loads led to reductions in deep and REM sleep, increases in light sleep and wake duration, and lower HRV, collectively indicating impaired sleep quality and autonomic recovery despite longer total sleep duration. Conversely, insufficient sleep resulted in slower pace and decreased training efficiency on the following day, though runners tended to compensate by extending running duration. Conclusion: The training and sleep characteristics of recreational runners were significantly influenced by sex, performance classification, season, and weekday-weekend rhythm. A bidirectional association between training and sleep was observed, with high training loads and insufficient sleep posing potential risks to performance and recovery. It is recommended that recreational runners monitor both training and sleep, take individual differences and temporal rhythms into account when scheduling training, and avoid excessive training loads to achieve a balance between training and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.