ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Operative lung cancer patients' knowledge of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We conducted this survey to explore what operative lung cancer patients knew about pulmonary rehabilitation and the factors that influence it. Methods: Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020, patients who received thoracic surgery were enrolled in this study. We used a three-part questionnaire to collect the clinical features and knowledge of pulmonary rehabilitation. Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled in this study. Most patients were female, ≤60 years old, had normal pulmonary function, and had been diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with abnormal pulmonary ventilatory function, higher preoperative COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, higher CAT differences, and higher mMRC differences showed a higher awareness of pulmonary rehabilitation (p = 0.043, 0.029, 0.178, and 0.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis suggested that preoperative CAT score (p = 0.01) and mMRC difference (p = 0.001) were the factors associated with awareness of pulmonary rehabilitation. Conclusion: Many factors may influence the patients' knowledge of pulmonary rehabilitation. We found that a higher preoperative CAT score and a larger mMRC difference were factors associated with awareness of pulmonary rehabilitation. However, assistance should also be provided to patients who do not fall into these categories, as they may lack knowledge of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.