Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41797836›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Technique for Difficult Wharton's Duct Cannulation.

Evgeniya Molotkova, Henry Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evgeniya MolotkovaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4795-7458
Henry HoffmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparative ease of cannulating Stensen's duct is contrasted by the acknowledged difficulty in cannulating Wharton's duct. Although access to Wharton's duct can be facilitated with a floor-of-mouth incision, it is desirable to avoid this open approach. We present a technique emphasizing the use of a tapered 4-0 Prolene suture to cannulate Wharton's duct. This guide directs placement of a 26-gauge angiocatheter through a modified Seldinger technique. The suture guide is then removed to permit infusion of saline with expansion of the duct to allow for passage of a 0.38-mm guidewire and progressive dilation with a 24- and 22-gauge angiocatheter over the larger guidewire. This technique was successful in all 4 patients who had difficult access to Wharton's duct. One of these patients also underwent successful cannulation of Bartholin's duct. This novel technique for cannulation of Wharton's duct offers an alternative approach for patients with challenging anatomy.

Indexed as

cannulationsalivary glandssialendoscopysialography

Identifiers

PMID41797836
PMCPMC12963782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.