ArticlePEC innovation2026
Comprehensiveness, quality, and readability of non-invasive prenatal testing information on Japanese medical institution websites.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We conducted an analysis of online information on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) provided by Japanese medical institutions recognized by the certification system (certified institutions) and other institutions (non-certified institutions). Methods: We identify institutional websites from google Japan that used three keywords related to prenatal testing ( Results: Among certified institutions, the mean comprehensiveness score was 7.36 out of 20, and the mean DISCERN score was 42.6 out of 80, categorized as "fair," although nearly half were rated "poor" or "very poor." Most websites required "lower advanced" reading proficiency. Websites from non-certified institutions showed higher comprehensiveness and readability than certified institutions. Conclusion: NIPT-related information on certified institution in Japan is often insufficient in terms of quality. By contrast, non-certified institution, although ethically problematic, may provide more comprehensive and higher-quality information. Certified institutions should improve the quality and clarity of web-based communication to support patient's decision making. Innovation: This is the first study to assess the NIPT-related websites in Japanese medical institutions. Critical informational gaps were identified, highlighting the need for trustworthy and readable online resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.