ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
3D-printed hip prostheses with regenerative integration: a state-of-the-art comprehensive review.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article offers an in-depth review of the design and modeling of 3D-printed hip prostheses, emphasizing the integration of regenerative medicine, especially in the context of custom Rapidly Destructive Osteoarthritis implants. It traces the history of Total hip arthroplasty and current implant materials, along with recent advances in tissue engineering strategies and biofunctionalization methods to enhance biological integration. Computational processes are examined, including segmentation, image processing, computer-aided design, finite element analysis, and CAE simulations. It also discusses techniques in additive manufacturing that control porosity and stiffness, as well as strategies for recruiting host stem cells. The overall performance of existing THA approaches, combined with reliance on outdated surgical workflows and the complexity of clinical standards, creates challenges for the adoption of innovative implant research and limits broader application. International standards (ISO/ASTM), regional regulations (MDR, FDA), ethical considerations, and professional design guidelines are crucial components of this review, guiding safety, reproducibility, and the clinical impact of next-generation THA solutions. Finally, this review proposes a novel 'regenerative design' paradigm. Distinct from traditional biointegration methods, this framework integrates patient-specific imaging, mechanobiology-based architecture optimization, and biologically calibrated simulation to direct endogenous cell recruitment and vascularized healing explicitly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.