ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Summary of best evidence for nutritional management in adult patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To retrieve, screen, appraise, and synthesize the best evidence on nutritional management for adult patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) to inform the development of standardized clinical nutrition management protocols for CRRT. Methods: Using the 5S evidence pyramid model, we conducted a top-down search of domestic and international sources, including databases of systematic reviews, guideline portals, professional association websites, and comprehensive databases, to identify clinical decision aids, evidence summaries, guidelines, standards, protocols, systematic reviews, and expert consensus statements. The search period was from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2025. Two evidence-based nursing experts independently performed quality appraisal, evidence extraction, and grading for the included literature. Results: A total of 12 documents were included: one clinical decision aid, one evidence summary, eight guidelines, and two expert consensus statements. After systematic extraction and integration of the relevant evidence, 16 evidence points were summarized across three domains: nutritional assessment and selection of nutritional pathways, energy and protein provision, and monitoring and supplementation of electrolytes and micronutrients. Conclusion: The best available evidence on nutritional management for adults undergoing CRRT synthesized in this study is comprehensive and scientifically sound. It provides a reference for clinical practice. However, personalized nutritional plans should be developed based on patients' clinical conditions to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.