ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest high resolution computed tomography.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects up to 60% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) remains the gold standard for diagnosis; however, it involves radiation exposure. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a safe and accessible tool, but it has not yet been validated for ILD diagnosis in RA. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study including patients followed for RA. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, history of heart failure, acute cardiac decompensation, respiratory symptoms within the last 3 months, and pneumonia within the past month. All included patients underwent both LUS and chest HRCT. The diagnostic performance of LUS was assessed using HRCT as the reference standard. Results: A total of 73 patients were included (18 men and 55 women), with a mean age of 55 ± 12 years. The mean Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) was 3.47 ± 1.40. Chest HRCT identified ILD in 28.8% of patients. According to the semi-quantitative ultrasound score, interstitial involvement was detected in 21.9% of patients. The sensitivity of LUS was 59.1%, and the specificity was 94.1%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813. The optimal cutoff was 5 B-lines, yielding a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 94.1%. Discussion: LUS demonstrated good diagnostic performance for ILD detection in RA patients, with high specificity. These findings suggest that LUS may represent a useful screening tool to identify patients requiring further evaluation with HRCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.