ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Hyperbaric oxygen-assisted neurological recovery in a patient with classic heat stroke: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heat stroke (HS) is a critical condition involving severe central nervous system injury. While standard treatments-such as cooling, ventilation, and fluid resuscitation-can stabilize patients, they are often inadequate in addressing long-term neurological complications, including impaired consciousness and paralysis. The persistent deficits in neurological function remain a major clinical challenge. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), which improves brain oxygenation and supports neural repair, offers a potential solution. In the case we present of a patient with HS and brain injury, HBOT was associated with neurological recovery, although its specific contribution relative to conventional treatment remains uncertain. Case presentation: A 35-year-old male laborer was admitted to the hospital following 5 h of outdoor exertion in high ambient temperatures. He presented comatose with a GCS of 3 (E1V1M1), with sluggish pupillary light reflexes and absent Babinski signs. Initial management in the intensive care unit included active cooling, mechanical ventilation, and supportive therapy. Despite these measures, the patient remained unconscious with quadriparesis. Cranial CT and MRI indicated signal abnormalities in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres and basal ganglia, which were consistent with HS-induced encephalopathy. Upon stabilization of core temperature, the patient started HBOT at 0.20 MPa for 60-80 min daily in 10-day cycles. After 27 sessions, the patient exhibited progressive neurological improvement, including recovery of consciousness, restoration of limb strength, assisted ambulation, and partial return of speech. The patient was ultimately discharged in accordance with medical advice. Conclusions: In this case of classic heatstroke with cerebral involvement, HBOT was introduced after partial neurological improvement had already occurred, and was associated with further recovery. The precise role of HBOT in addition to supportive care remains to be clarified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.