ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Lung ultrasound B-lines predict adverse clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis in a resource-limited emergency department.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis increases the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other respiratory complications. Point-of-care lung ultrasound (POCUS) detection of B-lines may facilitate early risk stratification where advanced imaging is limited. This study evaluated the association between B-lines on lung ultrasound and clinical outcomes in adult sepsis patients treated in a resource-limited emergency department. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on sepsis patients treated in the emergency department from January to December 2024. Ultrasound documentation and electronic medical records were analyzed to compare overall mortality, hospital length of stay, and mechanical ventilator use between patients with and without B-lines. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilator use, and hospital length of stay. Descriptive statistics compared outcomes between patients with and without B-lines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted association between B-lines and hospital mortality, controlling for clinically relevant confounders. Results: Among 184 sepsis patients, 56 (30.43%) exhibited B-lines on lung ultrasound. Mortality rates (16.07% vs. 4.68%, Conclusion: The presence of B-lines on lung ultrasound in sepsis patients is significantly associated with increased mortality, higher rates of mechanical ventilation, and prolonged hospital stays. These findings support the potential utility of POCUS B-line assessment for early risk stratification in resource-limited emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.