Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41797704›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Artificial Intelligence Applicability in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Present Perspectives and Future Formations.

Maimuna Hasan, Md Faiazul Haque Lamem, Muaj Ibne Sahid, Md Rifat Sarker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maimuna HasanR. P. Shaha University, Narayanganj, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0004-8638-0442
Md Faiazul Haque LamemR. P. Shaha University, Narayanganj, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0006-7795-8892
Muaj Ibne SahidR. P. Shaha University, Narayanganj, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0006-9647-8990
Md Rifat SarkerR. P. Shaha University, Narayanganj, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0006-4483-4586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), like ChatGPT, Microsoft copilot, and Google Gemini, is transforming pharmaceutical research, production, and healthcare delivery. Despite global adoption, the level of AI awareness, readiness, and application among pharmaceutical professionals remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of AI among pharmaceutical professionals and to identify factors influencing its adoption. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among professionals from various pharmaceutical sectors using a structured online questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze demographic characteristics, AI familiarity, usage, and perceptions. Most respondents (81.8%) were aware of AI, but only 2.3% reported extensive familiarity. ChatGPT was the most frequently used AI tool (63.6%), while only 27.3% reported organizational adoption. Support for AI adoption was high (86.4%), yet only 22.7% considered the industry fully ready. Perceived benefits included improved efficiency (86.4%) and quality (70.4%), while major concerns involved automation dependency (36.4%) and implementation costs (34.1%). Pharmaceutical professionals show strong interest in AI despite limited organizational readiness and formal training. Structured education, regulatory guidance, and ethical frameworks are critical for effective AI integration in the sector.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug IndustryHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAI-driven pharmaceuticalartificial intelligence (AI)digital healthdrug developmenthuman-AI collaboration

Identifiers

PMID41797704
PMCPMC12972552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.