ArticleInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health2026
Prevalence and occupational risk of hip osteoarthritis and rotator cuff lesions - claims data analysis.
Article in International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHip osteoarthritis (OA) and rotator cuff lesions (RCL) are major musculoskeletal disorders that cause chronic pain, reduced mobility, and work incapacity. While certain occupational groups have been studied, limited data exist on other physically demanding professions typically performed by women, such as healthcare, childcare, and hairdressing. This study examines the prevalence and occupational risks of hip OA and RCL in Germany. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using anonymized, large-scale, nationwide claims data (2016-2020). Individuals aged 18-65 years diagnosed with OA (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [ICD-10]: M16) or RCL (ICD-10: M75) were identified. Physically demanding occupational groups were classified according to the German Federal Employment Agency and compared to a propensity score-matched control group of office workers.
resultsBetween 2016 and 2020, the prevalence of hip OA increased from 1.8% to 1.9%, and RCL from 4.4% to 4.6%. Higher prevalence rates for RCL were found in exposed occupations (4.9%). Increased risks were observed in elderly care (OA: odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, RCL: OR = 1.49) and in health and nursing care (OA: OR = 1.33, RCL: OR = 1.27) compared to office workers with lower physical exposure. Restricting the analysis to women yielded similar effect estimates.
conclusionsThe findings highlight an elevated occupational risk for hip OA and RCL in physically demanding professions such as nursing. Targeted prevention, ergonomic interventions, and early screening are essential to reducing work disability and improving long-term health outcomes. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2026;39(1):68-78.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.