Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41797548›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2026

Seizure prophylaxis in glioma surgery: a synopsis from the SPRING RCT.

Michael D Jenkinson, Helen Bulbeck, Jade Carruthers, Jacqueline Burns, Sarah Lessels, Richard Dobbie, Rachael Watson, Ciara Gribben, Alasdair G Rooney, Gerard Thompson and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Michael D JenkinsonThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4587-2139
Helen BulbeckBrainstrust - The Brain Cancer People, Cowes, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6775-5251
Jade CarruthersScottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Jacqueline BurnsScottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah LesselsScottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Richard DobbieScottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachael WatsonScottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-7366-5890
Ciara GribbenScottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-7847-220X
Alasdair G RooneyCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6755-4866
Gerard ThompsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1722-2235
Tomos RobinsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8695-9738
Luke ValePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-8429
Sara ErridgeEdinburgh Cancer Centre, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-2505
Colin WattsInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-8791
Anthony G MarsonThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-8806
Robin GrantCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2597-9510
SPRING Study Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In patients with a glioma, 50-80% will have seizures during their lifetime and half of these will be drug resistant. Seizure risk is increased perioperatively (around the time of surgery) at tumour progression and shortly before death. In seizure-naive patients with glioma undergoing surgery, existing guidelines do not recommend routine use of prophylactic antiseizure medication. Despite this, an antiseizure medication, levetiracetam, is frequently prescribed perioperatively in many neurosurgical units. Objectives: To determine whether in seizure-naive, newly diagnosed cerebral glioma patients undergoing surgery, prophylactic levetiracetam, pre-operatively and for at least 1 year post operatively, produces a meaningful (> 50%) reduction in the risk of developing seizures when compared with standard care (no prophylaxis) and is cost-effective. Design and methods: We undertook a two-arm, multicentre phase III randomised trial in 14 neurosurgery units across England and Scotland, with an embedded health economic evaluation, comparing 12 months of prophylactic antiseizure medication (levetiracetam) versus no antiseizure medication (comparator) in patients with suspected cerebral glioma undergoing surgery. The target samples size was 804 participants. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of a seizure within 12 months of randomisation. The secondary outcomes were time to first seizure, time to first tonic-clonic seizure, time to death (overall survival) and time to tumour recurrence (progression-free survival). The impact of prophylactic levetiracetam on mood, personality, fatigue and memory, severity of first seizure if it occurred and quality of life were assessed. The planned health economic outcomes were costs to the National Health Service and Personal Social Services and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year at 12 months and modelled over estimated survival. Analyses were carried out using the intention-to-treat principle. Results: Between 9 October 2019 and 30 August 2022, 94 patients were recruited, from 24 to 79 years of age and randomised to prophylactic levetiracetam ( Limitations: The trial was underpowered and closed early due to slow recruitment impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately one quarter of patients died within 12 months and did not reach the primary outcome of 1-year risk of seizure. Conclusions: Given the trial was underpowered, there was no evidence of a difference in the 12-month seizure risk between the randomised groups and limited evidence regarding potential cost-effectiveness. The role of prophylactic antiseizure medication in glioma surgery remains undefined. Future work: SPRING provides the highest quality data available for a future, individual patient data meta-analysis. A definite trial is still needed to answer this clinical question. Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 16/31/136.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsBrain NeoplasmsGliomaLevetiracetamSeizuresAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeScotlandAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamCLINICAL TRIALGLIOMALEVETIRACETAMPROPHYLAXISSEIZURE

Identifiers

PMID41797548
PMCPMC12989904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.