ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
A narrative review of considerations when assessing potential relationships between Guillain-Barré syndrome and vaccines.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute, immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy that can result in progressive muscle weakness, paralysis, and, in severe cases, respiratory failure. While the majority of GBS cases are preceded by infectious events, concerns about a potential link between vaccines and GBS have periodically arisen. This commentary examines existing information on the association between GBS and vaccines and reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and infectious and noninfectious triggers of GBS. GBS incidence rates are influenced by age, seasonality, geography, and comorbidities and are increasing over time. The complexities in assessing causality between vaccination and GBS are addressed, including the importance of diagnostic certainty and standardized case definitions. The self-controlled case series study design is most commonly used to investigate potential relationships between vaccines and GBS due to its efficiency (i.e. only vaccinated persons with GBS are included) and ability to control for fixed confounders (e.g. comorbidities), but results may be biased by time-varying confounders (e.g. viral infection activity) and lack of diagnostic confirmation. Further, attributable/excess risk estimates based on such studies are influenced by background/baseline GBS risk, which may differ by studied population. This review aims to inform ongoing research and guide public health risk assessment for this rare adverse event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.