ArticleCancer2026
Risks of thrombosis and hemorrhage in concurrent use of anticoagulants and potential interacting prostate cancer agents.
Article in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalized Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPharmacokinetic studies suggest that specific prostate cancer therapies may alter the metabolism of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), leading to elevated risks of thrombosis or bleeding.
methodsTo assess the risk of thrombosis or bleeding, population-based, retrospective, parallel analyses were conducted in Ontario and Alberta, Canada, among adults patients with prostate cancer who were prescribed a DOAC and a potentially interacting androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (including enzalutamide, apalutamide, or abiraterone) compared with non-DOACs between 2012 and 2023. Analyses were stratified based on a DOAC-inducer cohort (enzalutamide or apalutamide, which might increase the risk of thrombosis) and a DOAC-inhibitor cohort (abiraterone, which might increase the risk of bleeding). Overlap weighted Cox proportional hazard models accounting for 37 covariates were performed independently in each jurisdiction and were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
resultsIn total, 2997 individuals were included (2107 from Ontario and 890 from Alberta). In patients who received enzalutamide or apalutamide, there was no increased risk of all thrombosis in the DOAC groups compared with the non-DOAC groups (pooled hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.93). In patients who received abiraterone, no significant differences were observed in any bleeding events comparing the DOAC and non-DOAC groups (pooled hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-13.99). The results were consistent in multiple sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsThe concurrent use of enzalutamide, apalutamide, or abiraterone with DOACs did not contribute to clinically meaningful changes in the risk of thrombosis or bleeding in individuals with prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.